http://www.ajc.com/news/while-some-robots-learn-deliver-pizza-these-are-saving-lives/omLlCfB7FhCK6yXM5FijiO/
The diction used in this article is formal and uses a wide range of high vocabulary. The topic of a military use robot does stand for a certain type of speech. The author, Ian King seems to have no emotional attachment to the topic he is reporting. There is not any part of the topic that would stir a persons emotions for empathy. The high level of diction shows that the author has a very dedicated tone to his topic. He seems to be fully focused on the article at hand. The author uses a effective use of syntax while fitting in a quote from the military officials as well. The author tries to relay to the audience of how complex this project is. Robots being able to help people in everyday life would be a big thing to discuss in society. The authors tone throughout the article seems to be neutral. The format of the article seemed to be informative so he takes no sides about the idea. He tries to relate that facts of the positive and negative effects of robots in the military. The authors tone ultimately is respectful to the proposal of robot soldiers. The purpose of this article was to inform the population about robots and their involvement in the military. Eventually in the future the robots could be fighting for the American people's lives. If that were to happen then we have a right to know the background. The overall goal for the author is to try and inform the public about the background of what is happening. The author includes reports about jobs that have already been completed by the robots to help increase his credibility and accuracy of the story. The organization of the article is very simple. King begins by using a simple joke about how robots have been used for simple tasks. He then moves on to state how they could be applied to new types of projects in the future. The author provides personal testimonies from military officials or police officials to allow them to speak about their experiences with the robots. Many organizations were mentioned throughout the article to help backup the mechanics of the robot.
0 Comments
http://www.ajc.com/news/local/lawyers-representing-homeless-man-bridge-fire/FSR9avD6JnP45evjZWlfxJ/
The words used by the author would show that there was a very little amount of emotion. The topic of lawyers representing the arsonist could not be the most emotional topic as well. The level of the authors emotional attatchment seems minimal. Diction used by the author is formal to maintain a professional manner. Logos is present throughout the article especially when the author describes how the fire was set off. The process of how the fire went off was destined in basic knowledge to allow people reading to understand it easily. Tone in the article seems as if it is not sorrow but just worry. The worry would come from how the bridge was collapsed causing many problems. The author resides in the city so one of the main bridges being destroyed would make their day more stressful. The purpose of the article was to help the public truly understand what happened in the accident. Many people could have been left in the dark not being able to know what happened. This article helped the population in Atlanta know what happened and the repercussions. The name of the lawyers representing the homeless man was also being stated showing how it is being handled by the government. The author begins his informative information rather than an argument by stating the topic. He then goes on to state the logic behind the accident of the I-85 bridge being destroyed. He doesn't incriminate the homeless man and his actions but he seems agitated about the event. |
AuthorMultiple AJC reporters and news Subs. ArchivesCategories |